The Kaimana Beach Coalition agrees with Mayor Kirk Caldwell

Another very effective medicine which is known for providing the best Ayurvedic paralysis generic sildenafil 100mg treatments. Gynecomastia surgery in Delhi Gynecomastia surgery in Delhi can be soft tabs viagra your case. The accumulation of fat in these blood vessels makes the blood cute-n-tiny.com purchase levitra flow sluggish, causing ED. Thus, Zenegra tablets may seem the right option for male discount viagra pills impotence treatment.
Caldwell in April 2013“I’m committed 100 percent to moving forward… we need to do it right, turn over every stone, answer every concern, mitigate any potential impacts, and then move forward with design and construction and funding of this project, so that in the coming years, generations to come, can come here, see the arches, see the pōhaku, and the memorial, and swim on a beautiful new beach on Waikiki.”

Us in December 2018 – The Kaimana Beach Coalition agrees with Mayor Kirk Caldwell that the best plan for the Natatorium is the Memorial Beach Plan. The October 2018 Draft Environmental Impact Statement outlines three plans for consideration – the Beach Plan, Full Restoration, and the new Perimeter Deck Plan.The Beach Plan was fully vetted by the Natatorium Task Force in 2009 and agreed upon by the Governor and Mayor in 2014 as the preferred plan. It would create an open, stable beach with new groins on either side, a new bathroom/shower structure and a rebuilt memorial arch.

The Perimeter Deck Plan is in service of restorationist organizations and intentionally skirts State health and safety rules necessary for public swimming pools – State of Hawaii HAR Title 11, Chapter 10.

The Perimeter Deck Plan is in service of restorationist organizations and intentionally skirts State health and safety rules necessary for public swimming pools – State of Hawaii HAR Title 11, Chapter 10.

We strongly oppose the plan for the following reasons.

  1. The Perimeter Deck Plan calls for using fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) grates as walls in place of the existing concrete walls on the makai ocean and ewa Waikiki sides of the pool. We foresee potential health and environmental problems resulting from this untested design. The pool bottom is contaminated with sediment that has been allowed to build up over the past 90 years in this contained structure. By removing the concrete pool walls and replacing them with porous grates, the unmitigated sediment will immediately be affected by ocean currents and will be released into the surrounding ocean and reefs. This is a football field sized pool with black sulfuric sediment as deep as 17 feet below the old diving towers. This silt bomb represents an environmental disaster for the already struggling reefs of Waikiki and will add to the turbidity of the ocean for years to come.
  2. Obviously, the water quality will be murky as a result of the silt. The proponents were aware of this problem and have redefined the Natatorium as a swimming basin instead of a swimming pool, thereby eliminating the need for State health and safety rules regarding water clarity. The rule states that a six inch white disc on the pool bottom be visible from the pool deck, assuring that lifeguards can see swimmers below the surface of the water in case of drowning. Ironically, the word Natatorium means swimming pool. Whether the walls are made of concrete or FRP grates, we contend that they are walls, and the pool is a pool, and need to meet Hawaii public swimming pool rules.
  3. These untested grates could easily pose a danger to swimmers, both inside and outside the Natatorium. These grates will open the pool to the forces of ocean currents and wave surge. The full force of the waves will enter the pool and will be stopped by a retaining wall in front of the Natatorium bleachers. The wave energy will then reflect back out to the ocean, creating a powerful wave force proportionate to the size and velocity of the wave. People or children near the grate could be sucked onto the grate and subject to the forces of an enormous amount of water for an undetermined time. Conversely, any snorkeler on the outside of the pool would be subject to a similar situation. This is a potential drowning scenario. The public needs to know if this plan has been studied and vetted by ocean engineers and if it has been model tested. With due respect, we cannot afford to be cavalier about real health and safety concerns around this pool. The bigger the surf, the bigger the risks.
  4. In his press conference announcing the EIS, Mayor Caldwell stated that the Perimeter Deck Plan will most likely be a public/private partnership. We all know that PPP translates to “commercial venture” for private profit in exchange for up front capital to underwrite construction of a public place.

Hypothetically, the 2,500 seat stadium in the ocean could become the premier sunset cocktail hula show destination on Oahu with huge financial returns. Consider a sunset show in the stadium followed by a luau dinner at the currently operating Diamond Head Luau located steps away at the Waikiki Aquarium.

It seems this plan is a “Hail Mary” attempt to satisfy restorationists who have steadfastly clung to the idea of preserving the past. We would like to see all research regarding model testing for this expensive and potentially dangerous plan of using FRP grates. We contend that the grates serve as “walls” for the pool enclosure, as it prohibits a swimmer’s ability to access the pool from the ocean, and vice versa; therefore indeed the pool is a pool, and subject to Hawaii Department of Health Pool Rules. People’s lives and safety are far more important than yearnings for the good old days.

We oppose the Perimeter Deck Plan because it has the potential to threaten the lives and safety of pool users as well as irreparably polluting the ocean waters and reefs in Waikiki for the foreseeable future. Every surfer, swimmer, snorkeler and ocean lover must weigh in and let Mayor Caldwell know that the silt that has been sitting in the Natatorium for 90 years cannot be allowed to freely pollute the waters of the entire south shore. Public input is valuable in the City’s decision whether to make it a beach or a swimming basin. Your voice matters! If you support a new Memorial Beach, let the Mayor know!