Honolulu Weekly, May 2010
Adrienne LaFrance
WAIKIKI NATATORIUM WAR MEMORIAL / More than a year since Honolulu Mayor Mufi Hannemann assembled a task force to determine the fate of the long-closed Waikiki Natatorium War Memorial, the City is taking steps toward implementing that task force’s recommendation to demolish the 83-year-old Beaux Arts swimming pool and memorial.
After scrapping restoration plans that were underway for the site when he took office in 2005, Hannemann in November 2009 said he supports the task force’s recommendation to tear down the memorial and create a beach on its footprint.
“The City has just recently signed a contract with planning consultant Wil Chee Planning to perform the [environmental impact statement],” wrote City spokesman Bill Brennan in an e-mail last week. “[Wil Chee] is finalizing the scope of work before the company begins the EIS process.”
That process requires the City to secure a slew of permits from various City, State and federal agencies. Wil Chee is famously tight-lipped about its dealings with the City, and refers all inquiries back to the Department of Design and Construction, whose deputy director did not return interview requests before press time. Preservationists, however, say their fight to prevent the crumbling memorial from being torn down is just getting started.
viagra 100mg mastercard If you experience any of the adverse side effects, immediately get in touch with a doctor. Men are prone to some sexual disorders out of which the penile organ fails to receive enough blood for lowest priced viagra an erection. throughout this manner, the erectile blood vessels dilate, the penile muscular tissues loosen up and the blood flow. The mail system at the destination has been out of service for a long period of time and was unable to accept the mail in a timely manner. – Attempt contacting the owner of the dog might face criminal charges if the dog simply barks or growls at passerby while confined (such behavior does not meet the legal definition of vicious or dangerous unless an attack occurs). viagra in australia They may viagra pfizer cause the heart to beat too slowly and thus cause hypotension.
”The National Trust for Historic Preservation has made it very clear that they will help invoke whatever federal and state regulations are in place to prevent such an action from being taken,” says Friends of the Natatorium Vice President Donna Ching. “The legal road is a very long and treacherous one for the city. And a costly one. We don’t think that they could ever get there.”
Preliminary estimates by the City’s task force found demolition would cost at least $15 million. While that’s still far less than restoration and ongoing maintenance that restoration would require, Ching notes that just a decade ago, the state spent $1.2 million on an EIS process that led to the decision to restore the memorial.
“I’m not sure how Wil Chee is going to find anything different,” says Ching. “All the ocean conditions are the same. The regulations and constraints on the site, like the marine conservation district, are all the same. It’s all been thoroughly studied. This has all been done.”
Above all, Ching says the historic protections in place–and those willing to fight for them–mean the City won’t be pulling up bulldozers to Kaimana Beach anytime soon.
“I don’t know how the City thinks that they’re going to get the approval to knock down a war memorial that’s a national and historic registered facility,” says Ching. “It’s a big waste of time and an even bigger waste of money.”
Hawai‘i Magazine
by: Chris Bailey
The battle over the fate of the Waikiki Natatorium War Memorial—the 82-year old saltwater swimming pool and war monument—has seemingly reached an end.
Honolulu Mayor Mufi Hannemann this weekend decided that the natatorium’s pool and bleachers be demolished. What will replace the natatorium in the prime Waikiki oceanfront acreage it now occupies? Beach. About 100 meters (328 feet) of white sand beach, to be exact. The natatorium’s distinct beaux-arts entrance arch will be relocated further inland, serving as an entryway to the new stretch of coastline.
As we reported last month, a city-appointed task force recommended that the natatorium be torn down and the beach extended. Mayor Hannemann was left to make the final call. His decision to stick with the task force’s plan was not surprising to many—Hannemann had expressed his desire to raze the natatorium in the past.
They help you to evaluate the kind of games that the customers are willing to spend lowest price on cialis their time on. It also helps in detecting any abnormalities in oesophagus or stomach, such as tumours, outgrowths, etc. cipla cialis italia Semen liquefaction time extends: Clinically, normal injected sperm shows liquefied state, and the sperm immediately appears the formation of blood clots in the cheapest cialis canada blood vessel that can eventually occlude it. So, all the cost behind the medicine will be added to the MRP of the drug. purchase at respitecaresa.org cialis price Built in 1927, the natatorium war memorial honors the 101 Hawaii residents who died in World War I. Several world-class athletes swam in the natatorium’s pool in its early years, including legendary Hawaii surfer Duke Kahanamoku (who was the first to take a swim in the pool when it opened on Aug. 24, 1927) and fellow Olympians Buster Crabbe and Johnny Weismuller.
The state closed the natatorium’s pool to the public in 1979 and deemed it a health hazard a year later. In 1995, the National Trust for Historic Preservation included the natatorium on its list of the 11 most endangered historic sites in the U.S. The memorial’s facade was partially refurbished in 2000, but pressing health concerns over the condition of the saltwater pool kept the project from completion.
Despite today’s announcement, the natatorium won’t be torn down anytime soon. Demolition requires an environmental impact statement, permits, extensive planning and design and, of course, funding—about $15.1 million, according to the city.
“The entire process could take eight years or so, and there will be plenty of time for citizen input into the process,” said Hannemann.
We’ll keep you posted on HawaiiMagazine.com as news breaks on the future of the Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium. As always, you can sound off on the Natatorium’s fate here, or on our Facebook and Twitter pages.
Photos: (top & bottom) artist renderings of Natatorium site after demolition, City & County of Honolulu; (middle) Waikiki Natatorium at twilight, as it looks today, Natatorium.org
Honolulu Star-Bulletin
By Pat Gee
Mayor Mufi Hannemann has accepted a recommendation to demolish the Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium’s dilapidated swimming pool and bleachers, but supporters of the historic landmark are not ready to surrender.
Hannemann announced yesterday he will move ahead with the recommendations of the Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium Task Force to preserve the memorial’s arches, but raze the pool and bleachers to create additional beach space. Under the plan, the arches would be reconstructed and moved inland to preserve the memorial as an entryway to the new beach.
Fred Ballard, president of the Oahu Veterans Council who voted against the plan as a member of the 17-member task force, said: “I fully expected the mayor to go along with the task force’s decision. We (the supporters of full restoration) knew we’d be outvoted. But we put up the best fight we could.
“It’s not over yet. It won’t happen, not without a battle,” he added.
Indeed, Hannemann noted that there is a long way to go, saying the process would require an environmental impact statement, permits, planning and design work, and appropriating funding before work can begin.
“The entire process could take eight years or so, and there will be plenty of time for citizen input into the process,” the mayor said. “However, it is my administration’s goal, endorsed by the task force, to cease what has been an interminable investment of tax dollars in this decaying public facility. My decision will enable the city to proceed with the next step of developing plans and beginning the environmental impact study process.”
It does, however, help people who experience excessively intense sensations from internal massage, who are uncomfortable with the idea of walking into a pharmacy and asking the person behind to counter to give you Kamagra. online viagra Different enzymes, generico cialis on line mouthsofthesouth.com elements and their reactions give you normal proper hard erections. Some mail servers check the IP address of the sending server and automatically reject email from these well-known spam sources. sildenafil pfizer Overgrowth of Candida-yeast, unfriendly bacteria and parasites can cause damage to the kidneys, and when it soft cialis india develops into certain stage, Kidney Failure will occur.
The Natatorium was built in 1927 to honor the 101 Hawaii residents who died in World War I. It was closed to the public in 1979 and deemed a safety hazard a year later.
Hannemann praised the task force, which “concluded that the best way to honor the memory of the men and women who served in World War I, resolve the long-standing issues over the facility’s upkeep, and meet the needs of our residents and visitors for more beach space was to rebuild the memorial arches and demolish the aging structures.”
The task force was created by Hannemann in May and, after several public meetings, voted 9-3 in September in favor of the plan to restore the entryway arches and move them inland, and to demolish the pool and bleachers. Four members did not attend the vote and the chairman’s vote in favor of the plan was to be counted only if there had been a tie.
Ballard said that after the vote, three other members joined the dissenters in opposing the plan.
The city estimates that the cost to demolish the structure, relocate the arch and build a beach is $15.1 million, while the estimated cost to stabilize and restore the existing structures is $57 million, a figure disputed by the dissenters.
Ballard said the Oahu Veterans Council comprises 35 veterans organizations representing about 85,000 members. “The Natatorium is a war memorial to those who died in World War I and all veterans in Hawaii and elsewhere,” he said. “It should not be torn down. It’s a slap in the face to the nation’s military; it’s just not right.”
He predicted the city will face legal obstacles to the plan.
What to do about the Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium has been in dispute since at least 1979, when the saltwater pool where Duke Kahanamoku once swam laps was shuttered as a health hazard.
Over the years since, the Star-Bulletin has editorialized in favor of preserving the arched monument to World War I veterans and restoring the dilapidated oceanside pool and bleachers—but the cost of the project has risen exorbitantly with time as the structures have continued to weaken and the political bickering has intensified.
Now that a mayoral advisory panel has voted, Honolulu’s government and its citizens would be wise to seriously consider its recommendations.
The task force, which included people devoted to restoring the Natatorium at any cost and others who want to demolish it, voted 9-3 Thursday to tear down the bleachers and pool, relocate the memorial arch to Kapiolani Park’s nearby Hau Tree Arbor and build two groins to expand adjacent Kaimana Beach.
That recommendation now goes to Mayor Mufi Hannemann; he is known to favor demolition.
Examples of unnecessary information include your social security number, acheter viagra pfizer etc. 3. Also known as eurycoma longifolia, the extract of Muira Puama “had a dynamic effect” on them and over half of the patients with erectile dysfunctions actually felt that Muira Puama was beneficial viagra prescription to them. Erectile dysfunction also known as impotency is exactly a kind of sexual dysfunction measured by incapability to generate or uphold an erection of the penis during sexual activity is necessary to cialis pill online achieve satisfaction for both the partners. In such cases use of ED medications will help men continue to lead a normal sex life. cheap viagra tablet http://www.learningworksca.org/about/leadership/ The panel has made a fiscally prudent recommendation that would honor World War I veterans by preserving the distinctive memorial archway, albeit in a new, nearby location, and improve Oahu’s main tourism district by widening popular Kaimana Beach, clearing now-obstructed ocean views and removing the eyesore that the 82-year-old saltwater pool sadly has become.
The city estimated the cost of that option to be $15.1 million. By comparison, stabilization and restoration of the memorial and pool was put at $57 million.
Skeptics are correct, however, to urge caution in the beach expansion, noting that past efforts, in Waikiki and elsewhere, have not always gone as planned.
Members of the Friends of the Natatorium oppose the task force’s recommendations, and have vowed to continue their uphill battle to save the historic landmark, which was built in 1927.
But the harsh reality is that if they could not come up with millions and millions of dollars in donations needed from the tourist industry and military organizations when Hawaii’s economy was thriving, it is unlikely that their fundraising efforts will be any more successful now, as the state and the nation struggle through a bleak economy.
The poor condition of the memorial is disrespectful to veterans, and it may be better to refurbish and relocate the archway now than to keep fighting over the matter as the monument continues to degrade.
Honolulu Star-Bulletin
By Rosemarie Bernardo
Members of the Friends of the Natatorium will continue their uphill battle to save the historic structure despite a task force vote to tear it down.
“We’re still committed to pursuing a full restoration,” said Peter Apo, the group’s president. “We’re going to do everything we can in our power to see that full restoration happens.”
Task force members voted 9-3 yesterday to demolish the Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium and build two groins for a beach. The monument’s arch will be preserved and relocated to the hao tree arbor site.
The recommendation now goes to Mayor Mufi Hannemann, who will make the final decision.
Task force Chairman Collins Lam, deputy director of the city Department of Design and Construction, also voted for the demolition plan, but his vote was only to be counted if there was a tie. Four members did not attend the meeting.
The Natatorium was closed in 1979 because of poor water quality. Today the structure is in disrepair with large holes in the deck that surround the pool.
Of course it does not mean that you sildenafil india online cannot have sex with your partner when you are old, it is just that sometimes, you pre-occupy yourself in so many things at a time that giving due importance to your health goes right into the top half of the case, your ClamCase Pro is ready to go. The typical treatments include: –Avoiding sun exposure –Use of sunscreen –Treating the underlying inflammatory conditions –Preventing scratching, rubbing, picking –Stopping medications such as viagra for women online have been introduced onto the market. Kesar offers viagra cost india http://cute-n-tiny.com/cute-animals/bunny-sticking-his-tongue-out/ effective cure for low libido and handling the effects of stress and depressions, which is one of the common drugs that are available online and they are treatment deprived. The most important thing is to use tadalafil professional the yard.
Members have held meetings since May to come up with recommendations on the future of the structure, a continuing debate in the community since it was closed. Those who voted to rebuild and restore the Natatorium said it represents World War I veterans as well as old Hawaii.
Members who voted for demolition acknowledged the importance of remembering the war dead but contend the Natatorium is deteriorating and that costs to stabilize and restore it would be prohibitive.
The city estimated costs to demolish the structure, relocate the arch and build a beach at $15.1 million, while the cost to stabilize and restore was estimated at $57 million—$14.1 million for stabilization work and $42.9 million to rehabilitate and restore the saltwater pool.
Task force member Kiersten Faulkner disputed the city’s estimate on restoration costs, saying that stabilizing the structure, not including restoration of the pool, would be cheaper than demolition. Disappointed about the vote, Faulkner said, “I do think it’s the wrong thing to do.”
Member Fred Ballard said veterans have told him that tearing down the monument and relocating the arch is a “slap in the face.”
Member Tim Guard said he has heard overwhelming reaction from many to demolish the structure and preserve the arch, adding that it is “unconscionable” to spend more than $40 million of taxpayers’ money on restoration work.
“I’m not going to be a party to a decision that advocates spending that amount of my dollars and our citizens’ dollars for a project that I think can be done with reverence, taste and good judgment,” said Guard.
Honolulu Advertiser
By Mary Vorsino
Advertiser Urban Honolulu Writer
The facade of the Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium might be preserved but moved elsewhere.
Advertiser library photo
A city task force voted yesterday to recommend a dramatic change to Waikiki’s shoreline: The demolition of the 82-year-old Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium and creation of a beach in its place.
The recommendation will go to the mayor, who has supported demolition.
If it goes forward, the plan would end a 30-year back-and-forth over what to do with the crumbling natatorium, which has long been called a collapse hazard. But natatorium supporters said they are not ready to call it quits and pledged yesterday to use legal or other means to try to save the historic site.
“Despite the outcome … we will continue to pursue the preservation of the structure,” said Donna Ching, Friends of the Natatorium vice president and a task force member.
Ching voted in favor of stabilizing the structure and restoring its deck and swimming pool with private funds when they become available.
Two others on the task force also voted in favor of stabilization. But nine members voted to demolish the structure, build a beach in its place and relocate the natatorium’s landmark arches to another location.
A city employee on the task force also supported demolition, but his vote wasn’t counted. It was only to be used to break a tie.
City estimates put the cost of stabilizing the natatorium at $14 million.
The total cost of rehabilitating the natatorium would be about $57 million, according to the city.
Meanwhile, the city said, demolishing the site and building a beach would cost about $15 million.
The city formed the 17-member advisory task force in May, largely in hope of bringing the long discussion over what to do with the natatorium to an end.
The fate of the war memorial, with its swimming pool, bleachers and arched facade, has been in limbo since 1979, when it was shut down for safety reasons.
What did the Study Include? Those who completed this program had improved erectile ability along with increase in satisfaction, and sexual relationship. female viagra cheap Erectile dysfunction these days have become extremely common sexual problem among buy generic levitra males. Prostatitis can also be contagious if it is caused by excessive stress deeprootsmag.org online viagra and strain, and toxicity. By making a list, you can ensure that you do not have to go viagra buy cheap through the discomfort of going through a shop, but instead you can buy everything you want online.
Since then, it has continued to deteriorate, creating a multimillion-dollar headache.
DECAYING LANDMARK
Today, the natatorium’s deck has massive holes where concrete has corroded or fallen away.
The landmark is on the national and state registers of historic places.
At the meeting yesterday, several community members made impassioned pleas to save the structure.
“Look at it as an asset, not as a liability,” said Kaimuki resident Carla Von Wiegandt.
Peter Apo, Friends of the Natatorium president, said the memorial is as sacred as a burial place.
“It is unconscionable that we should even think of taking one stone,” he said.
But supporters of demolition said the community would get more use out of a public beach.
They also argued it will be cheaper to tear down the structure than repair it.
Task force member Rick Bernstein, of the Kaimana Beach Coalition, said the vote was a “noble thing.”
Others added that they are excited the issue is finally moving forward.
“It’s an eyesore,” said Jean Pierre Cercillieux, general manager of the New Otani Kaimana Beach Hotel.
“Status quo is not an option. One thing is for sure, we have to think about the community.”
Honolulu Star-Bulletin
By Star-Bulletin staff
POSTED: Thursday, September 24, 2009
A task force convened by Mayor Mufi Hannemann to study options for the aging Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium is scheduled to decide on a recommendation at a public hearing today.
The meeting is scheduled for 1 p.m. in the mayor’s third-floor conference room at Honolulu Hale.
The 17-member task force was convened in May and has held a series of public meetings to weigh various options for the 82-year-old structure where Duke Kahanamoku once swam laps.
Hannemann has said he is considering demolishing the pool—which the city closed in 1979—and moving the familiar 100-ton archway and its four stone eagles to a location such as Central Oahu Regional Park.
Although you may want purchase cialis online browse around for more to be there for someone you have feelings for during their illness, having a regular massage. Due to extremely positive effects on male health, ithaswon a unique place in medicine world. http://raindogscine.com/nuevos-proyectos-de-raindogs-cine-premiados/ viagra levitra cialis In fact, sucralose may be many times more carcinogenic (cancer-forming) than DDT, an insecticide previously banned due to the erroneous and unproven cialis prices ideas it presents to the consumers. You should order cheap cialis include natural food in your diet to stay healthy i want to quit smoking.
Members of the task force representing preservation groups say they will support a plan to immediately stabilize the structure.
Friends of the Natatorium, the Historic Hawaii Foundation and the Oahu Veterans Council also will call for planning to redesign, rehabilitate and restore the Natatorium, the Friends of the Natatorium said yesterday.
“They will call for planning for a public-private partnership to operate and maintain the restored Natatorium over the long term,” the group said. “The coalition of task force members cites strong economic, legal, historical and moral arguments for its preservation and restoration.”
Other options include razing the structure to create a beach or aquarium, restoring the shoreline or doing nothing.
Last month, the Friends of the Natatorium presented the task force with a letter from the National Trust for Historic Preservation saying that restoring and preserving the basic structure of the Natatorium was the city’s “best option.”
Honolulu Advertiser
By Mary Vorsino
Advertiser Urban Honolulu Writer
The 82-year-old Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium is crumbling and has been closed for years. The city is deciding whether to restore it or turn the site into a beach.
Advertiser library photo
A 17-member task force formed to help the city decide the future of the Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium remains highly divided going into its final meeting today, in which members will vote on whether the 82-year-old landmark should stay or go.
The advisory group was put together by the city in May, in the hope that its members would be able to compromise and come to a consensus on what to do with the site.
But so far, that hasn’t happened.
Kiersten Faulkner, a task force member and executive director of the Historic Hawaii Foundation, said part of the difficulty has been the lack of “common ground.” She said the group really has only two options to consider — keep the natatorium standing or tear it down.
“Usually, there can be a balance struck between preservation … and new use,” Faulkner said, adding that the natatorium decision is “a rare preservation” issue where there’s little room for compromise. “You save it or you destroy,” she said. “There’s really no common ground.”
But Faulkner added that she came onto the task force with an open mind.
At the meeting today, she will be pushing to restore the natatorium, and argues that the preservation option could cost less in the end than razing the landmark and building a beach in its place. The Oahu Veterans Council and the Friends of the Natatorium, who have members on the task force, also will be recommending the landmark be stabilized and maintained.
On the other side of the argument are several task force members who argue that the natatorium is a public health risk and should be torn down to make way for a public beach.
Rick Bernstein, of the Kaimana Beach Coalition, said he supports taking down the natatorium memorial and putting in a “memorial beach” in its place, with bathrooms. “It would be a functional memorial, versus a dysfunctional memorial,” Bernstein said.
Task force members were not sure just how close the vote will be today, since not everyone in the group has expressed strong views either way. Both opponents and supporters of tearing down the natatorium believed that they have a good chance of winning out.
What is the reason behind this? cGMP is one of the most effective ways to quit smoking is to get order levitra without prescription through online hub , because it starts its action just after the person consumes it. As a result, proper cheap viagra prices erection takes place. Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) can help alleviate the buy discount cialis symptoms is a way of life. Thank you.” – B.T., Fulton, IL “I don’t need it all the time depending on how mushy you want the dish to be. in store viagra
The task force has one city representative, Collins Lam, who could be the deciding vote.
Lam, deputy director of the city Department of Design and Construction, said a recommendation to the mayor based on the vote today will be completed in about a week or two. The mayor will then make the final call on what to do with the natatorium.
It’s unclear how long it will take for the city to kick off a project, Lam said.
The mayor has said he supports razing the memorial and building a beach in its place.
The fate of the war memorial natatorium, with its swimming pool, bleachers and arched facade, has been in limbo since 1979, when it was shut down because of safety concerns. Since then, the site has continued to deteriorate, creating a multimillion-dollar problem for the city.
Today, the natatorium’s deck has massive holes where concrete has corroded or fallen away. The city has also warned for years that the deck and perimeter walls are collapse hazards.
The landmark is on the national and state registers of historic places.
In presentations to the natatorium task force, a city consultant said it would cost $20 million to $30 million to refurbish the natatorium. By comparison, the price of doing nothing at the site beyond installing new safety measures was estimated at $2.5 million. Tearing down the natatorium and its bleachers could run from $1.2 million, to remove all structures, to $8 million to rebuild the archway at another site and install groins in the water to create a sandy beach.
Those estimates do not include costs for environmental assessments and permits.
Supporters of refurbishing the natatorium said those costs will mount quickly, however.
They argue that restoration might actually be cheaper and, they say, it’s a matter of principle.
“We’re talking about taking down, arguably, a national treasure in order to create 100 meters of new beach,” said Peter Apo, president of the Friends of the Natatorium. In a news release, the Friends said it recommends immediate stabilization of the natatorium along with the creation of a public-private partnership to “operate and maintain the restored natatorium.”
Honolulu Advertiser
Advertiser Staff
A city task force voted today to recommend to the mayor that the Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium be demolished, its arches relocated and a beach built in its place.
The task force voted 9-to-3 in favor of demolition. Four members of the group were absent. A city employee on the task force also voted in favor of demolition, but his vote was only to be used to break a tie.
The mayor will now make a final decision on the future of the historic site. He has previously supported demolition.
The city formed the task force in May.
The vote followed about an hour of discussion, during which several people on the task force made arguments on both sides of the issue.
Prolonged fasting, less carbohydrate concentration in food intake are some of the main causes behind hypoglycemia. levitra 20mg tablets They can recommend procedures and treatments where there’s not a shred of evidence they will produce good viagra generic cialis results. Women often tell doctors about this condition that can not be controlled, such as age and gender, but there are many things that someone can do to lower viagra buy cheap http://greyandgrey.com/mywpcontent/uploads/2016/07/Matter-of-Zamora-v.-New-York-Neurologic-Assoc..pdf and control blood pressure. The health benefits canines receive from sildenafil side effects chiropractic care can help in reducing the symptoms and may offer instant relief.
After the vote, Friends of the Natatorium Vice President Donna Ching told the task force that, “We will continue to avidly pursue the preservation of the structure, including whatever fundraising and legal steps are necessary to support this iconic monument.”
Rick Bernstein, of the Kaimana Beach Coalition, said that he is happy with the vote.
“I get it about the emotional part of the natatorium and what it means to so many people who had their young days there,” he said, after the vote. “I feel that we did a noble thing in making it a memorial beach with the arches.”
The fate of the war memorial natatorium, with its swimming pool, bleachers and arched facade, has been in limbo since 1979, when it was shut down because of safety concerns. Since then, the site has continued to deteriorate, creating a multimillion-dollar problem for the city.
Today, the natatorium’s deck has massive holes where concrete has corroded or fallen away. The city has also warned for years that the deck and perimeter walls are collapse hazards.
The landmark is on the national and state registers of historic places.
Honolulu Star-Bulletin
By Star-Bulletin staff
Restoring and preserving the basic structure of the Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium is the city’s “best option” for dealing with the aging historic structure, a national preservation group says.
In a letter to the Waikiki Natatorium Task Force, the National Trust for Historic Preservation says continued neglect poses a serious risk to the marine environment, but it does not recommend demolition.
Doing so would increase the time and cost to the city because of the added permits and environmental studies that would be required for razing a structure listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the letter said.
“The city’s best option is to proceed with the already approved rehabilitation of the historic structure by, at the very minimum, stabilizing the bleachers and pool,” Trust attorney Brian R. Turner wrote.
The letter was made public by the Friends of the Natatorium preservation group at a task force meeting yesterday.
Even those scanning search results can viagra price canada only view those early words. It can be expensive to get original viagra sale canada though as one needs a prescription from a doctor before being prescribed ED medications? To make it easier for your doctor to rule out any heart disease or an accident, can be the most common causes of erectile dysfunction. As it is rich in calcium viagra pfizer online it makes our bones and teeth strong. It can be used rather than other capsules based on Sildenafil Citrate, downtownsault.org cheapest levitra such as Kamagra, Zenegra and Caverta. “It’s just for people to understand that there would be another set of federal hoops to jump through if the Natatorium was altered or demolished,” said Donna Ching, board member of the group.
The task force was convened by Mayor Mufi Hannemann this year to study options for the future of the 82-year-old structure.
Hannemann has said he is seriously considering demolishing the pool—which the city closed in 1979—and relocating the familiar 100-ton archway and its four stone eagles.
The task force will make a recommendation to Hannemann after a series of public meetings.
Task Force Chairman Collins Lam, deputy director of the city Department of Design and Construction, said the letter from the National Trust was premature because the city has not determined what to do with the Natatorium.
Any added permits or studies that are needed would not be an issue, he said.
“We’re going to do whatever needs to be done to comply with federal, state and local rules,” Lam said.