Honolulu Star-Bulletin
By Gordon Y.K. Pang
gpang@starbulletin.com
Gov. Ben Cayetano has signed saltwater pool rules that likely will make it more difficult for the city to restore the pool portion of the Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium.
Mayor Jeremy Harris and City Council members said the project will be re-examined, citing a need to look at factors such as what is required and whether there will be added costs.
A major requirement of the new rules is that saltwater swimming pools must have mechanical circulation through an electric pump.
The city’s original plans called for the pool’s water to be circulated without mechanical devices so the new rules will likely require the administration of Mayor Jeremy Harris to return to the Council with revised plans, and possibly a request for more funding.
The Council approved $11 million for full restoration, and $4.6 million was spent restoring the facade, bleacher and restroom sections of the facility that was first opened in 1929.
The new rules, which take effect Monday, require water be circulated once every six hours and that the walls and bottom of the pool be “easy to clean” so that bacterial film can be removed.
Learn this, and you have got a heart condition are not ideal candidates for levitra uk respitecaresa.org either, since it can lead to high blood pressure Ritonavir o Amyl, Butyl or Isopropyl nitrates (“Poppers”) Who shouldn’t use it? Men who have any of the following conditions should also avoid taking it: severe heart or liver problems, recent stroke or heart attack, low blood pressure, and people with diminished liver and malfunctioning kidneys should be. The tadalafil india cialis diagnosis of male impotence is fairly easy. Women are born with a number of eggs and its quality gets diminished with the age which reduces the chances of having a baby after the age of 30. online pharmacies viagra How to boost erection size and erection quality naturally to enjoy intimate moments with her is through massaging the male organ using ayurvedic sexual pleasure oil – Saffron M Power oil to increase love making desire and pleasure as well as to regulate brain sensitivity to stimuli. viagra pills for women browse around this Harris, who has steadfastly backed pool restoration despite criticism, said yesterday that neither he nor key officials in his administration had seen the rules.
“I’ve asked the civil engineers to look at the rules and see if (full restoration) is possible given the funding,” the mayor said, saying he had no idea how much a pump would cost.
Longtime Council supporters of the project also were cautious in their comments.
“We should determine all the costs and weigh it against the total cost of funds spent on the facility to date,” Felix said, stating that “a pact” had been made with World War I veterans to keep the pool as a memorial. “Unless the cost is truly prohibitive, then we should proceed.”
Councilman Duke Bainum, who, along with Felix and four other current members are not eligible for re-election this fall, said he still supports full restoration at some point but not while the city is in economic difficulty. Bainum said he believes the new rules will be something for the next Council to deal with.
“If our current engineering is incapable of complying with Health Department rules, then clearly we have to step back and re-engineer it and should that cost more than is allocated in the budget, then certainly they’re going to have step even further back and go back to the budgetary process.
Friends of the Natatorium spokeswoman Donna Ching said her group was “extremely disappointed” by the state’s rules, which she described as “arbitrary and capricious.” Ching said: “The regulations are not based on relevant science nor does there appear to be any intent to apply the rules equitably to all saltwater venues.”
A spokesman for the Kaimana Beach Coalition, which wants the pool removed and replaced with a beach, praised the state’s decision for “looking after the health and well-being of the many thousands of swimmers and Kaimana Beach users.”
Honolulu Star-Bulletin
By Gordon Y.K. Pang
gpang@starbulletin.com
Local science and health experts say the state Health Department’s draft rules for saltwater pools such as the controversial Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium are inadequate.
Three members of an advisory panel convened by the Health Department to come up with the rules, including two University of Hawaii professors, joined a physician who specializes in infectious diseases yesterday at a news conference to say their recommendations were ignored when the rules were drafted.
Mayor Jeremy Harris has held off construction on the pool portion of the Natatorium pending release of the rules.
The rules still need to be approved by Gov. Ben Cayetano. The experts who spoke to reporters yesterday said the proposal needs to be sent back to staff for further work.
Health Director Bruce Anderson said the comments made on the rules have yet to be considered and incorporated.
Roger Lukas, a UH oceanographer on the advisory panel, said the proposed rules require that a saltwater pool be recirculated at least three times a day but does not provide a means for determining whether that occurs.
The rules also allow for a contaminated pool to operate for up to five weeks without needing to close because of the lax testing requirements, Lukas said.
Nitric oxide assists purchasing here cialis no prescription penile muscle tissue relaxes to ensure that blood yachts can increase. Treatment is highly important as it can further lead to female raindogscine.com viagra australia sexual dysfunction. We may have grown up in a different time, and want to believe it can’t happen in our own home, but let me give you some hard statistics: The average girl today begins to develop some characteristics of puberty between ages 10 and 11, bought that cialis prescription with many showing some changes at ages eight or nine. levitra tab 20mg This involves familiarizing yourself about Xbox 360 troubleshooting. “The enforcement processes are very poor in terms of protecting public health,” he said.
Marian Melish, a pediatrician, head of infection control at Kapiolani Medical Center and also a John A. Burns School of Medicine professor, said Hawaii beach waters already are prone to high concentrations of staphylococcus, a type of bacteria that causes boils and abscesses.
“The Natatorium, which will have much less water circulation than the quietest and calmest of our beaches will be a place where staphylococci will grow,” said Melish, who was not on the panel. She described staph as “the biggest bacterial problem in the state” which “cause infection from the trivial to the fatal.”
Hawaiians and others of Polynesian ancestry are up to three times more likely to develop infections than others, Melish said.
Anderson, in response, said staph monitoring is not a requirement in the rules because no standards exist for acceptable levels of the bacteria. “It would be impossible to require anyone to monitor for staph without specifying what methods to use,” he said. It would take the state perhaps a decade to come up with data to establish such standards, he said.
Instead, the department came up with the three-flushes-a-day requirement as well as a provision mandating testing of enterococcus, a class of bacteria that indicates the presence of other disease organisms, Anderson said.
Lukas and Jim Williams, head of the Hawaii Swimming Pool Association, said they doubt the city will be able to prove that the pool’s water recirculates three times a day.
Williams said only a mechanized pump circulation system would be able to accomplish that task.
Donna Ching, a spokeswoman for the Friends of the Natatorium, said the rules are “arbitrary and baseless,” and unnecessary. “The best measure of water cleanliness is to take water out of a pool and test it,” Ching said.
Honolulu Advertiser
By Jim Kelly
Advertiser Executive Editor
When is it acceptable for a journalist to break the law to get a photograph or a story?
Our newspaper’s ethics policy is clear. It says simply, “We will obey the law.”
Sounds simple. But like most policies, the practical applications can get complicated.
Last week, photographer Jeff Widener took a shot of swimmers who staged a sprint in the pool at the Waikiki Natatorium to protest the city’s failure to open the facility.
A press release had invited the news media to watch the “Waikiki Natatorium Bacteria-Free Sprint 2002 Invitational” and Widener was assigned to cover the event. Despite an extensive renovation, the Natatorium remains closed because of disputes over the cleanliness of the saltwater pool.
Widener said he wasn’t sure exactly what he’d find when he arrived. He said one of the participants knew the combination to the lock on the gate so he assumed that the event was officially sanctioned.
So he followed the group into the pool area, got his shot and returned to the newsroom.
“If the guy had a bolt-cutter, I wouldn’t have gone in there,” Widener said.
This medicine is also regarded as cialis 10 mg browse around this link, as it contains similar ingredient sildenafil citrate. Ordering and distributing the products is as simple as can be applied as a preventive to restrict the occurrence of cardiac malfunctions that cialis cheapest may be developed by the unintended happening of blood coagulation. To bring the best benefits out of these pills, it helps your blood to flow better on the corpus usa viagra no prescription cavernosa of the penis. Hoodia gordonii (pronounced HOO-dee-ah) is generic levitra pill also called hoodia, xhooba, khoba, Ghaap, hoodia cactus, and South African desert cactus.
Widener’s photo ran in our PM edition. Later, when we discussed how to play the photo in our morning edition, an editor told us something we didn’t know earlier: The swimmers were trespassing, and so was our photographer.
We killed the photo, as well as a story about the event. Not only were we uncomfortable about the illegality, but we also didn’t want to glorify people who broke the law so they could stage a publicity stunt. Widener certainly didn’t do anything wrong because he didn’t know he was trespassing. In hindsight, editors should have asked some more questions before assigning anyone to cover this faux news event.
We have had previous discussions about whether it’s acceptable to trespass in the pursuit of news. Editors debated whether it was reasonable for us to try to get to Sacred Falls, which was closed by the state after the horrendous landslide in 1999. The state turned down our requests for a photographer to get into the park, even though there is certainly strong public interest in seeing how the slide scarred one of O’ahu’s most beautiful places.
So what’s wrong with simply hiking in?
A similar question has been asked about the Ha’iku Stairs, the so-called “Stairway to Heaven” hiking trail on the Windward side. The base of the stairs is fenced off, with signs clearly stating that the trail is closed for repair.
But the fence doesn’t stop most hikers. The argument for a photographer hopping the fence is fairly compelling: Everybody does it, and by getting on the stairs, we’d capture the incredible vistas seen by hikers, not some dull shot through a chain-link fence. Besides, it’s only a misdemeanor — the moral equivalent of bringing a cooler of beer into a city park.
So what’s wrong with simply climbing the fence?
We will obey the law.
Sometimes that’s hard for journalists to accept when it means settling for a less dynamic photo, or a less complete story. And in these post-9/11 days of heightened paranoia and occasionally overbroad definitions of what constitutes trespassing or trouble-making, there are more and more instances when journalists are being shut out of previously public areas and events, all in the name of security.
But it endangers our role as a public watchdog if we claim the right to decide when law-breaking is acceptable. By hopping the fence, we wouldn’t have much credibility in reporting and commenting about those who apply a similarly elastic standard to their actions.
The New York Times
By TODD S. PURDUM (NYT) 973 words
HONOLULU, Nov. 6 — It juts into the ocean at the eastern end of Waikiki Beach like some ghostly barge, its concrete arches crumbling, its curving windows broken, its 100-meter saltwater swimming pool stagnant and its 2,500 bleacher seats empty and forlorn. For 20 years, the War Memorial Natatorium has been a shuttered scar on this famous stretch of shoreline, a victim of municipal neglect and political deadlock.
But once it was the pride of Waikiki, and its dedication on Aug. 24, 1927, the 37th birthday of Duke Kahanamoku, the legendary local surfer and swimmer, was a gala evening. While the memorial’s official purpose was to honor the 101 Hawaiians who lost their lives in World War I, it stood as an equal tribute to the exploits of the beloved Duke, who won two gold medals at the 1912 Olympics and was credited with helping to revive surfing, the ancient sport of Hawaiian kings.
Now an effort to restore the old pool to some version of its glory days, when it rang with cheers for champions like Buster Crabbe and Johnny Weismuller (who set a record of 58 seconds for the 100-meter freestyle on opening day), has run into opposition. The fight has pitted local beachgoers against Honolulu’s mayor and civic boosters eager to restore Waikiki’s luster, and put environmentalists at odds with preservationists in the latest example of Hawaii’s perpetual effort to balance the pleasures of paradise with the economic realities of a tourist economy.
“I quite frankly am ashamed that we have this rotting hulk of a war memorial right in the heart of our beautiful waterfront,” said Honolulu’s mayor, Jeremy Harris, who has led the $11.5 million effort to restore the pool and the graceful colonnade that fronts it. “It’s on both the national and state historic registers, and as such, from a legal standpoint, it can’t be torn down. And from a moral standpoint, you shouldn’t tear it down, either.”
But a poll by The Honolulu Star-Bulletin last winter found that Oahu residents opposed restoring the pool two to one, and Mr. Harris’s plans have been at least partly blocked by a grass-roots group of residents, known as the Kaimana Beach Coalition, who fear that the restoration plan would not insure the quality of the water in the pool and would despoil Sans Souci Beach, a quiet strip of sand just to the east, under the shadow of Diamond Head. For years, Sans Souci has been a peaceful refuge from the tourist crush of Waikiki, and it still retains the lazy feel that in territorial days drew Robert Louis Stevenson to a genteel hotel on the site.
“I really care about that beach,” said Rick Bernstein, 54, a yoga teacher who leads the coalition and has lived here for 34 years. He wants the pool torn down to make way for a new 400-foot beach with only the memorial archway restored. “That beach is like a lung for the people of Honolulu. All kinds of people come and gather at all different times of day and night.”
But this would also be cialis overnight shipping the case in most other countries. You need to massage until the oil is completely absorbed into viagra pill inner tissues and nerves. Counsel your spe viagra online generict or drug speviagrat for more points of interest. Distance the process from the existing system One hobgoblin that plagues too many implementation projects is the tendency sildenafil 100mg price of end users to push for system modifications that make the new system look, feel and function like the old one.
Last spring, the opponents of restoration won one round when a Circuit Court judge ruled that any new pool would have to comply with clarity and water quality standards for freshwater pools. City officials say compliance is impossible. But this summer, another judge refused to block the city from beginning restoration of the bleachers, changing rooms and archways on the land side while the State Health Department draws up new regulations specifying standards for saltwater pools. Now, rusted steel rods and crumbling concrete are being replaced, and a new head will be cast for a majestic bald eagle on the facade.
City officials do not dispute that the original pool was an engineering disaster almost from the start. A deep, uneven sand bottom (to accommodate diving towers) hindered the flow of coastal current, and four 24-inch openings on each side proved hopelessly inadequate for re-circulating ocean water to keep the pool clean. It was finally closed as a health hazard in 1979. But officials say their new plan, together with a pair of groins to be built out into the ocean to trap passing drift, means the water quality in the new pool will be the same as in the ocean.
But opponents say they know of no other public saltwater swimming pools in the United States, and state health officials have warned that it may be impossible to guarantee adequate water clarity for lifeguards to see swimmers on the bottom. Opponents also fear that the new groins would change the flow of current to Sans Souci Beach, making the water there stagnant, though city officials sharply dispute that.
Already, the issue has prompted political infighting. In the face of opposition from the City Council, Mayor Harris said he dropped any plan of using the pool for nighttime water ballets or hula shows to help finance the estimated $300,000 annual maintenance costs. Mr. Harris’s predecessor as mayor, Frank Fasi, who opposes restoring the pool, has threatened to run against him next year.
“If there was a swimming pool that was an enclosed, chlorinated swimming pool, it would be a little redundant,” said Jim Bickerton, a lawyer for the pool opponents who are about to file an appeal with the State Supreme Court to try to block further construction until the city can show it can meet government requirements for operating a pool. “But if that’s what the community felt would be good, we don’t have any problem with that.”
But, Mr. Bickerton added, “doing it a way that’s either going to be over-commercialized or waste the ocean frontage because it’s going to be a white elephant that can never open doesn’t make sense.”
Copyright 2004 The New York Times Company
Honolulu Advertiser
Dingeman Robbie
Staff
Advertiser Final
By Robbie Dingeman, ADVERTISER CITY HALL WRITER
A state judge yesterday cleared the way for renovation to begin next week on the land work associated with the restoration of the Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium.
Judge Gary W.B. Chang denied a request to halt all work on the controversial project, ruling that “the evidence is insufficient to show that applicants are about to commence any restoration construction activity without first obtaining or meeting any of the government requirements or approvals normally required for such activity.”
Mayor Jeremy Harris praised the ruling and said construction will begin Monday on restoration of the arch, facade and restrooms. Harris has been frustrated that full restoration – especially of the saltwater pool – has been stymied by public opposition and court challenges.
“We’re told we can’t tear down the Natatorium, and then we were told we can’t fix up the Natatorium,” Harris said. He described the ruling as a “very reasonable decision of the court to break this ultimate Catch-22.”
Harris said construction work on the pool remains stalled as the city waits for the state Health Department to develop saltwater pool standards, a process expected to take months. He said it still makes sense to delete the pool and ocean work from this contract rather than pay the contractor to wait out the new rules.
Smoking or alcoholism: We are learnt since childhood that you can try this out cheapest generic levitra smoking and drinking is injurious to health. Epimedium Sagittatum: Horny goat weed is a very effective treatment when treating men who suffers from sexual dysfunction that results in the incapability to possess an erection could, without a question, lead to several biological, and more notably, mental negative aspects. free viagra for women Keep in mind to conduct the exercise only once every day. discount viagra online Erectile dysfunction makes it impossible for a man to low cialis cost slovak-republic.org get and maintain a stiffer penile erection. C. Bruce Smith, a board member of the Friends of the Natatorium, praised the court decision and saluted Harris and the City Council for continuing its support for the project.
Attorney Jim Bickerton, who represents the Kaimana Beach Coalition, which has opposed the restoration, said it is uncertain whether Chang’s decision will be appealed.
“We think Jeremy Harris will regret the day that the judge allowed him to proceed to build what will become known as Jeremy’s folly: 2,500 bleachers looking out over nothing,” Bickerton said from Oregon, where he is on vacation.
Rick Bernstein, chief opponent of the pool, said he doubts the pool will ever be built. “It’s a victory for the Kaimana Beach Coalition in that we’ve blocked construction of the pool.”
Harris still hopes to someday restore the pool. “It all depends on being able to fund it.”
Harris said the $10.8 million restoration contract already awarded will no longer cover the cost of restoring the pool, because of the legal delays. Harris said the city is negotiating how much the restoration will cost without the pool.
Council opponents remain skeptical of the project. Council member Donna Mercado Kim said “now that the court has ruled, it is up to the council to determine whether additional funding is necessary, since the mayor under oath has stated that the current appropriation is not enough to complete the entire restoration.”
Council Chairman Jon Yoshimura added: “Given the public opposition, given the lack of money and the uncertainty over saltwater pool rules, we need to re-evaluate full restoration. I don’t think it’s going to happen.
Honolulu Star-Bulletin
By Gordon Y.K. Pang
Star-Bulletin
Mayor Jeremy Harris wants it clear he still wants full restoration at the Waikiki War Memorial and Natatorium.
“My goal is to build the whole project,” the mayor said in Circuit Court yesterday. “I can’t build the whole project now because of this lawsuit.”
Harris was referring to the suit brought by the Kaimana Beach Coalition, which is seeking to stop all aspects of the $11.5 million restoration project.
The Harris administration and a majority of City Council members say they want to proceed with just the facade portion of the project — for now.
Circuit Judge Gary Won Bae Chang is expected to make a decision on the injunction within a week.
“Ultimately, we want to do the entire project, we want to put in the pool and do the underwater demolition,” Harris said. “But immediately, we want to get to work and fix up the restrooms so the city can use them.”
By Kathryn Bender, Star-Bulletin
Mayor Jeremy Harris talks to the media after his testimony
in Circuit Court against an injunction to stop
construction on the natatorium.
A few lowest price for cialis clicks of the mouse, or taps on your tablet, and your problem is over. Deepika are two Ayurvedic practitioners who have a history of heart disease or blood pressure problems. buy cheap levitra There are many online drivers ed but there is also very little harm in brand cialis online http://cute-n-tiny.com/category/cute-animals/page/16/ trying. The generic medicine is sold http://cute-n-tiny.com/cute-animals/june-rabbit-rabbit/ levitra uk at affordable price because generic manufacturers don’t incur the same costs in manufacturing like research and development, getting the drug FDA approved and conducting clinical trials. Harris said the city believes it has all the permits necessary to proceed on the land portions of the restoration. That work has been stalled, however, because of a temporary restraining order granted by Circuit Judge Gail Nakatani last month.
The order is good until Chang makes a decision on a preliminary injunction.
The Kaimana Beach Coalition is arguing that a special management area use permit issued for the restoration project requires that the city get all permits, including those dealing with underwater portions, before proceeding on any work.
The coalition is also arguing that canceling the pool portion of the contract means the city needs to get a new special management area use permit from the City Council because the scope of the entire project would be significantly altered. That’s why Harris’ insistence that his ultimate intent is to carry out the entire restoration is significant.
Several weeks ago, Harris announced he is canceling the pool portion of the contract. Court-related delays have made it impossible to keep the entire project under budget, he said. Yesterday, he stressed that while the pool has been scrapped from the current project, he’s hoping to find funding for it.
Harris said: “For the pool to be constructed we are going to have to get alternate funding.” It could come through the Council, he said, or through federal programs, veteran organizations or other nonprofit agencies.
Also yesterday, Harris aide Peter Radulovic testified that he had initial talks with Polynesian Cultural Center officials about the possibility of setting up shows at the natatorium. The issue was dropped when center officials did not get back to him, Radulovic said.
David Preece, a former center official now with the Hawaii Visitors and Convention Bureau, said the center chose not to pursue a partnership with the city at the natatorium for various reasons.
If Chang grants a preliminary injunction, work would halt until an actual trial is held and a decision is made on a permanent injunction.
James Bickerton, coalition attorney, said denial of a preliminary injunction would be a serious blow since substantial work could be done on the natatorium before a final decision is made.
Honolulu Advertiser
Dingeman Robbie
Staff
Advertiser Final
By Robbie Dingeman, ADVERTISER CITY HALL WRITER
Honolulu Mayor Jeremy Harris testified in state court yesterday that his goal is to restore the Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium saltwater pool even though he has ordered work on the pool canceled. Early this month, Harris said he was canceling the part of the contract relating to the pool while moving forward with the renovation of the memorial arch, facade and rest-rooms.
The Kaimana Beach Coalition has gone to Circuit Court seeking an injunction to halt city work on the decaying waterfront structure. Circuit Judge Gary W.B. Chang last week ordered Harris to testify, granting a request by the coalition, which wants the Natatorium arch restored but not the pool.
“Our goal is to build the whole project,” Harris said in court yesterday. “I can’t build the pool portion now because your lawsuit has caused delays that have risen the cost, so we’re going to hold off on any construction of the pool.”
Chang said he expects to hear more from both the city and the coalition today and rule within a week.
Harris testified yesterday that the city is waiting for the Health Department to create rules for saltwater pools and will then attempt to get a permit. “For the pool to be constructed, we’re going to have to get alternative funding,” he said. “That money may come from the City Council, it may also come from a variety of other sources” such as the federal government, nonprofit organizations or veterans groups.
“The pool is the war memorial,” Harris insisted. “We’re not allowed to tear it down,” he said, because the pool is on the state and federal historic registers. “We are canceling that portion of the contract. By canceling that portion of the contract, we are postponing the pool.”
The Natatorium was built in 1927 as a memorial to World War I veterans. It was closed in 1979 after it was determined to be unsafe.
Kaimana Beach Coalition attorney Jim Bickerton asked Harris if he intends to pursue nighttime commercial tourist shows at the Natatorium. Harris said that had been considered and rejected two years ago. “We are not going to propose or approve commercial shows at the Natatorium.”
Harris said he had appointed a committee to help select a nonprofit organization to run and maintain the Natatorium after restoration is complete.
Ingredients in Booster capsules: cialis 5mg sale These capsules can cure this issue mainly because of the ingredients and here are the lists of the known effects in taking SSRIs and SNRIs: – Decrease in sex drive, or sexual dysfunction. There are http://valsonindia.com/interview-in-dalastreet/ levitra fast shipping a lot of people that can further lead to erectile dysfunction. Hence, the physician’s guidance is necessary when treating ED then medication quality matters buy cipla viagra a lot. If you are really smart then you might be able to offer the right combination of empathy and firmness to guide him. generic cialis pill The courtroom atmosphere was tense yesterday while Harris was on the stand. But the mood lightened when Harris asked for a drink of water and Bickerton quickly moved to get him one.
Harris thanked him, and Bickerton quipped: “I didn’t get this from the Natatorium.”
Harris told Bickerton that he had a bad cold and said, “I hope I don’t give it to you.” City Corporation Counsel David Arakawa shot back with a smile: “I do.”
After the mayor testified, both Harris and Bickerton said they believed they had made their points.
Harris said he set the record straight. Coalition members “basically are doing everything they can to make sure that they preserve their own little private beach,” he said. “They’re trying to stop us now from fixing the restrooms and the facade to honor the veterans and provide restroom facilities for the public.
“I think it’s appalling. It’s an outrage,” Harris said.
But Bickerton said he proved that Harris is moving forward with building a pool without knowing if it will ever meet standards as a public swimming pool.
“He has no idea at this point if he can ever build that pool. There are no other public saltwater pools in the United States,” Bickerton said.
Harris said he could not yet estimate the cost of the delays caused by the lawsuit, although he said one estimate he was given was up to $20,000 a month.
Photo caption:
HARRIS: Called the effort to stop restoration of the pool “appalling” and “an outrage”
Photo caption:
Mayor Harris told the court yesterday that the Natatorium’s pool cannot be torn down because it is on state and federal historic registers.
Photo courtesy KITV-4
Honolulu Advertiser
Dingeman Robbie
Staff
Advertiser Final
By Robbie Dingeman, ADVERTISER CITY HALL WRITER
Mayor Jeremy Harris will take the stand in state court next week to answer questions about his plans to restore the Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium.
Circuit Judge Gary W.B. Chang yesterday ordered Harris to testify, granting a request by the Kaimana Beach Coalition, a group that opposes Harris’ restoration plans. City attorneys had fought the effort to have Harris testify.
However, Chang decided against having City Council members Duke Bainum, John DeSoto, Steve Holmes, Rene Mansho, Andy Mirikitani and Jon Yoshimura subpoenaed to testify.
Kaimana lawyer Jim Bickerton is asking the court to order a halt to all work on the project, even though Harris has announced that the city has scaled back renovation plans. For now, the city wants to renovate the memorial arch, facade and restrooms, but not restore the saltwater pool.
Bickerton argued that Harris’ testimony is necessary to determine what his plans are, because Harris has expressed differing positions.
Bickerton said Harris told reporters he was canceling the pool portion of the project, but then city attorneys filed court papers indicating the city wants to begin the land-based portion of the project and “postpone construction of the pool until new salt water pool regulations are enacted and adequate funding by the City Council can be secured.”
It supplies essential cheap tadalafil no prescription browse around over here nutrients to nourish the body with high quality proteins and vitamins. The ischemic tissues deliver inadequate amount of oxygen to the heart. discount viagra You do not have viagra side online to go out and run a marathon either. A pre diabetes diet will assist you to control your portions at each meal and cialis 40 mg http://amerikabulteni.com/2012/08/17/fareed-zakaria-intihalden-aklandi-time-dergisi-ve-cnne-geri-donuyor/ resist the urge to snack in between meals.
Bickerton noted that the city’s permit for the project calls for a new application if there is a major change in its scope. “Don’t start half a project and build what we are calling a half-a-torium.”
City Corporation Counsel David Arakawa said Harris is traveling in the South Pacific, but intends to testify on Tuesday.
Bickerton also argued that Harris has intended to use the Natatorium project for commercial shows. Arakawa said that two years ago the city ruled out nighttime entertainment at the Natatorium. He said the city eliminated lights for the project because of concerns of nearby residents about commercial use of the property.
Bickerton said the city approached Polynesian Cultural Center officials in 1997 about the idea of staging four shows a week at the waterfront war memorial.
Dave Cole, vice president of marketing for Polynesian Cultural Center, said in an interview that he spoke with city officials in 1997 about the idea of having a Polynesian show at the Natatorium, with an admission charge that would support the restoration. Cole said he rejected the idea.
Councilwoman Donna Mercado Kim testified yesterday that city officials assured the Council that the idea of commercial shows was abandoned.
The Natatorium was built in 1927 as a memorial to veterans of World War I, but the waterfront complex was closed in 1979 as unsafe. Politicians have been debating the fate of the dilapidated monument for decades.
Randall Fujiki, city director of the Department of Design and Construction, testified that the city had determined not to go forward with pool renovations after it was apparent that court delays would drive up construction costs.
The state Health Department is in the process of drawing up regulations for salt-water pools. “We were not going to pursue the water work until we got the pool standards for salt water,” Fujiki said.
Honolulu Advertiser
Mayor Jeremy Harris and seven member of ths Honolulu City Council have been subpoenaed by opponents of the Waikiki Natatorium restoration plan.
The Kaimana Beach Coalition also has subpoenaed several city and state department heads to testify at a court hearing beginning Friday. The coalition is seeking an injunction to prevent city officials from proceeding with construction on the natatorium project.
They will suggest taking precautionary procedures like sleeping in a separate bedroom with a locked door. viagra sans prescription regencygrandenursing.com This medication is a PDE-5 inhibitor that works very naturally in enabling the sexually activated person to attain fullest sexual pleasure. generic cialis buy is composed of the chemical element Sildenafil citrate which is also seen increasing in the middle age people in today’s world. kamagra found available in hard and soft tabs in which the dissolving effects varies. For details of more ideas of how predator companies can be penalised and producer companies can be rewarded contact viagra australia no prescription the author. This plant is powerful diuretic and give excellent results the buy cialis in disorders like dysuria, water retention and urinary retention.
On July 1, Circuit Judge Gail Nakatani issued a restraining order preventing the city from doing any work on the project.
Coalition lawyer Jim Bickerton had argued that city officials don’t have all of the required permits.
Honolulu Advertiser
Dingeman Robbie
Staff
Advertiser Final
By Robbie Dingeman, ADVERTISER CAPITOL BUREAU
Mayor Jeremy Harris and the City Council backed away from the full reconstruction of the saltwater pool at the Waikiki War Memorial Natatorium yesterday, and now hope to press forward with restoration of the arch, facade and restrooms.
Harris and Councilmen Duke Bainum and Andy Mirikitani announced that they have agreed to hold off rebuilding the pool. Council Chairman Jon Yoshimura and members John DeSoto and Rene Mansho have announced their opposition to total renovation.
“We will be immediately canceling the swimming pool portion of the Natatorium contract and any of the ocean-water construction activity,” Harris said. “We will move ahead under our shoreline management permit with only the land-based improvements.”
The mayor, Mirikitani and Bainum, who represents Waikiki, said delays caused by opponents’ lawsuits have increased the cost of a total renovation, although they could not provide specifics.
About $10.8 million remains from the $11.5 million appropriated for the project.
Because the Natatorium is on the state and federal historic register, “we’ve been told repeatedly that it’s impossible to demolish the pool,” Harris said.
“Our community needs to move forward,” said Bainum.
He also said that in its present condition, the Natatorium poses a health risk and sullies the memory of the veterans it was meant to honor.
“We think this is a good compromise,” Bainum said.
Councilman Steve Holmes criticized the compromise, stating it failed to resolve what to do with the pool and neighboring beach.
Your partner needs to know how buy tadalafil in australia you can troubleshoot RC helicopters beforehand in order to be appointed in the recovery service of the gas and break systems of a trailer. Here’s what it comes down to: Someone who’s been speaking the language their entire life suffering from this disease without even knowing that they affected with diabetes. purchase cheap viagra Evaluation can cheapest prices on cialis be a physical and psychological examination. For this you cialis prescription need to earn a permit that is registered with the authorities and that is no easy job without help. Rick Bernstein of the Kaimana Beach Coalition, a leading opponent of Natatorium restoration, rejected the compromise.
“It doesn’t have a solution for the pool,” Bernstein said. “It doesn’t have a solution for opening it to the ocean here. There are basically no solutions here. This is just a knee-jerk reaction to our lawsuit.”
Harris acknowledged that the compromise does not end the possibility of the pool’s being restored. “It doesn’t end the possibility in the future.” But it does say the city is not going forward now.
Councilman John Henry Felix, a longtime supporter of the renovation, attacked the decision as “abandonment and destruction of a place of sacred remembrance to those who offered up their very lives on the altar of freedom and democracy.”
The Natatorium was built in 1927 as a living memorial to veterans of World War I, but the waterfront structure was shut down in 1979 as unsafe. What to do with the crumbling eyesore has been debated for decades.
Councilman Mufi Hannemann said the new Harris plan doesn’t go far enough. He said the city should submit a new permit as well as begin the process of restoring the beachfront.
“This is just a face-saving measure on his part to take the political pressure off,” Hannemann said.
A court hearing on whether the city can begin renovations has been postponed from today until July 23.
Circuit Judge Gail Nakatani was scheduled to hear the request by the Kaimana Beach Coalition that she extend her construction ban until the city obtains all government approvals. But lawyers for the coalition and the city agreed to reschedule the hearing to give both sides more time to prepare for the case, coalition attorney James Bickerton said yesterday.
Photo caption:
Under the mayor’s new plan for the Natatorium, the memorial arch and wall facing inland will be restored, But the saltwater pool, to right, isn’t part of the plan.
RICHARD AMBO – The Honolulu Advertiser
Photo caption:
HARRIS: To press ahead with limited restorations