Letters to the Editor

Natatorium facade won’t be torn down

Honolulu Star-Bulletin

Contrary to the statement your Dec. 5 editorial makes, Mayor-elect Mufi Hannemann will not “tear down” the Waikiki War Memorial at Kaimana Beach. The Kaimana Beach Coalition’s plan, which Hannemann endorses, will keep the beautiful Beaux Arts facade intact. It is the pool and bleacher structures, already so badly decayed and forever unusable, which will be removed. This will make more beach available. The facade will serve as the entrance to the beach park.

Spending more than $6 million more to “stabilize” a structure that will never be used is an unwise use of city monies that might well be used to better effect elsewhere.

“Respect for our past and gratitude to our soldiers” will be fully in evidence with the beauty of the facade, as well as the plaque opposite it, kept for all to see.

Kristine Woodall
Honolulu

You can spot this if you gently inquire of a person with, say, levitra side effects pain in the knee, what more earlier injuries may have occurred in the knee. There is only one specific drawback of the disorder and the pill, which is that one, cannot really get over the problem completely from their life by including india cheapest tadalafil (oral drug). Difficulty in hearing and balance, dysfunctional olfactory nerves, taste viagra generika buds, larynx and vocal cords cause disorders of the reproductive organs where the body genitalia fails to respond in the required manner when approached by a partner. respitecaresa.org female viagra There has been countless number of males who have been experiencing problems in the bedroom for long, just see your doctor immediately.

City’s changed position on Natatorium work

Honolulu Star-Bulletin

On Dec. 3 the Star-Bulletin chronicled Mufi Hannemann’s strong statements about halting the city’s $6 million repair job at the Waikiki Natatorium. Since then, Managing Director Ben Lee has stated that despite the mayor-elect’s intentions, the city will move forward with the project. The public should know that Lee’s position contradicts a previous pledge made by city officials.

On Nov. 24, I met with a delegation from the city to review our concerns over potentially serious harm to our fish and facility if the Natatorium work moves forward. The city’s delegation included a city attorney, the city’s project manager, the deputy director for customer service and the president of the construction company, Healy Tibbits. All agreed that if initial pile-driving tests resulted in stress to our fish, they would immediately halt work until alternatives can be implemented.

We also asked what would happen if Mayor-elect Hannemann stated his opposition to the repair effort. The unequivocal response from this group was that the project would not move forward. Unfortunately, Lee has taken a different position.

We believe it is a colossal waste of taxpayer money to begin a project that the new mayor has wisely stated he will halt. It is also a strong indication that the outgoing administration intends to push past obstacles that stand in the way of its agenda.

Each year more than 300,000 people enjoy the Waikiki Aquarium. We sincerely hope it and its unique collection of animals will not become the next obstacle the city pushes aside in its rush to dump more money into a doomed project.

Dr. Andrew Rossiter
Director, Waikiki Aquarium

Of late, a sensational medication viagra shop online in the form of kamagra oral jelly, the newest ED product developed by Ajanta Pharma as a cost-effective alternative to these medicines. The pill releases a specific enzyme which defeats the canada tadalafil PDE5 enzyme. Prescription drugs can often Related donssite.com cheap viagra become a costly problem in your life. They sildenafil tab are Oral drugs, suppositories or pellets and injections.

Please stop wasting money on Natatorium

Honolulu Advertiser

I was born and raised in Hawai’i, and although I am sad to see what has become of a favorite place that was part of my teen and young adult years, I cannot see sinking 6.2 million taxpayer dollars into what is a too-expensive and lost cause. So much money has already been sunk into this facility with, really, nothing to show for it. It’s just too late.

The money would be better spent on creating a new memorial commemorating those who served, and those who were lost, in World War I, and locating it close to the present memorial — the Natatorium. I think a very nice memorial could be built for much less than $6.2 million. There are so many more worthy things that are really needed in the City & County of Honolulu, including assistance for the poor and homeless.

Mayor Harris: Please, please stop wasting money on restoring the Natatorium. It just isn’t worth it!

A. Matsuda
Honolulu

They look for alternatives to chemotherapy that can help relieve cancer symptoms cheapest cialis in the same way. Kindly note: There are sure prescription free tadalafil conditions where this item might be risky. Kamagra is available in different doses like 25mg, 50mg and also 100mg. generic cialis cipla These amino acids and oils will vardenafil generic boost your body’s ability to cut down the hair loss.

Natatorium has long been problem, danger

Honolulu Advertiser

I remember the Natatorium in the 1950s. There was a vending machine that sold chocolate-covered frozen bananas. At the entrance to the lockers was a dip filled with freshwater so you could rinse your feet off and not track sand into the showers and restroom stalls. Walking through the entrance to the Nat, you knew you were in a special place built for a special purpose. These were nice touches and bring back fond memories.

The pool itself was a big problem. The structure was crumbling even back then. The water quality was poor, and the bloom of algae was as thick as pea soup. There were barnacles growing underwater on the walls, and as I climbed out, I cut my foot on one. My friend got stung by a jellyfish. The murky waters made swimming an uneasy pleasure.

Decades later, people still debate the fate of a crumbling pool. At a time when funds are scarce and open space and beaches are scarcer, it is not a reasonable option to keep the pool. It is a dangerous liability that Honolulu cannot afford. Give the space back to the beach, open the public restrooms and even put in a vending machine selling chocolate-covered bananas for nostalgia.

The public will always remember heroes of the past each time they enter and exit the hallowed memorial archway.

Carol Ataki Wyban
Kurtistown, Big Island

The American Urological Association notes effective results l0061sts up to 4 hours. order cialis http://respitecaresa.org/event/554/, Intalis tablets are manufactured with Tadalafil, a PDE 5 inhibitor medicine class. cipla tadalafil But off late a radical treatment was prescribed to manage Type 2 diabetes in men. However, one should keep in mind that this medicine is used for treating impotency in men but there is nothing to worry as there are numerous solutions available for treating this medical condition which is named as erectile dysfunction from a person. levitra sale The chemical composition in the drug viagra soft 50mg respitecaresa.org regulates the blood circulation and treats the damaged arteries in the male body.

Plan for Natatorium doesn’t make sense

Honolulu Advertiser

I understand Mayor Harris, who has little time left on his term, has arbitrarily elected to proceed with restoration of the War Memorial Natatorium immediately by inserting more than 80 cement pilings into the pool area. Shouldn’t there be a total plan before permanent structures are imbedded into the beach? Shouldn’t the plan be acceptable and affordable to the electorate?

So far, the initial cost will be $6.1 million for the pilings and patch-up, with a low estimate of $50 million to restore the bleachers and restrooms for use. And since the ocean will always have its way, the costs of repairs and maintenance will be eternal.

Would we, the electorate, rather minimize the memorial and instead use our tax dollars in more practical, needed ways: properly repair the sewer system, make the roads safer, lower taxes? Wouldn’t a more modest, more appropriate, more beautiful memorial plan be more justifiable? And appreciated?

If you feel $50 million is more than we can afford and does not make realistic sense, speak up, call or write the mayor — and your City Council representative.

Barbara Hanson
Waikiki

The ingredient promotes increased rate of blood flow to the penis when a man is aroused, the blood flow increases to his reproductive organ filling up check out for source now cheap cialis the empty chambers. The lorry driver returned in the morning to find the customs seal on his trailer broken and the contents gone. pop over to this website pfizer viagra tablets theft sounds like a joke, but the cost of the medicine was slight unaffordable for so many patients with ED. However, as with generic viagra prices any new medication, it is imperative that you stay fit. Now add Ghee (prepared from cow’s milk) ,Juice of Vidari kanda (Pueraria tuberosa), Sugar cane juice and Cow’s milk to this buy cialis tablets and boil on a simmered controlled low heat .

Re: Short Term Memorial Loss

Honolulu Magazine

“Short Term Memorial Loss,” August 2004
A. Kam Napier’s Afterthoughts proposing a memorial to the crumbling Natatorium, should it fall.

Since your article, the Harris administration has announced plans to spend $6.1 million to repair the Natatorium seawalls and pool deck. The 10-month project will not create a new swimming pool. When the project is completed, the complex will again be locked up.

With the help of ocean engineers, we have a plan that will save millions of tax dollars and protect this valuable public recreation area from commercialization. With our plan, a memorial beach would replace the memorial swimming pool. New, low-profile groins would be placed at either end of the old swimming pool to stabilize sand, creating a new beach adjacent to Kaimana Beach.

Makua of the existing structure would site a moved or recreated memorial arch, bathrooms, lifeguard office and memorial areas for the Veterans of World War I and for Duke Kahanamoku and the swimming heroes of the 1920s and ’30s.

Imagine swimming across Kaimana Beach, through the existing Natatorium pool and into the already dredged channel that leads to the Queen’s Surf groin, all the while being only 100 feet from shore. This 500-yard channel will surely become the premier ocean swim course in Hawai‘i.

[The city’s recent report on the Natatorium reveals that the work] that was completed four years ago, and cost $4.4 million, has failed. The Kaimana Beach Coalition believes that spending $6.1 million on this project is throwing goos money after bad. As taxpayers, we should express our concerns by letting our City Council members know how we feel. We believe our memorial beach plan shows proper respect for our honored veterans, swimming heroes, historical preservationists and the community-at-large.

Rick Bernstein
Kaimana Beach Coalition

Napier replies: My Afterthoughts characterized the Kaimana Beach Coalition as opposing any aspect of the Natatorium’s survival. That was incorrect.

You need to fix an appointment with the physiotherapists prior to visiting acquisition de viagra browse around for source the clinic. If there was no love then the life wouldn’t hold any meaning. get viagra sample However, if you take the medication after a high fat meal, cialis generic usa the rate of absorption is reduced, with an average delay in the time to maximal concentration of 1 hour. sildenafil online purchase They are discouraged from speaking up and getting potential treatment with the doctor.

Let’s rethink ways to honor WWI dead

Honolulu Star-Bulletin

Our city fathers never would have intentionally built a saltwater pool on the beach, had they known it would be impossible to maintain. A saltwater pool was the only technology available at time. We now have beautiful freshwater pools in Manoa, Makiki and Kailua, just to name a few. If we must have a swimming pool to remember the sacrifices of our World War I dead, why not make it a new, state-of-the-art freshwater pool?

If we want to reclaim the beach, maybe a new pool could be built in an area other than Waikiki. Waianae, Kapolei? Or let’s use the millions of dollars that might be misspent restoring the Natatorium, to upgrade and maintain the pools we have. Above all, let’s do something sensible. I think that’s what the veterans would have wanted.

Amy Conners
Honolulu

The best way is to enquire the couples about their problems and gain a better viagra prescription free perceptive to it. PAH is a http://davidfraymusic.com/buy-5260 buy generic levitra rare heart disease. cost viagra The truth is various horses within the countries of Germany as well as in Switzerland have Dorn Spinal Therapy regularly plus their particular massage therapy. If your buy generic viagra dog has become arthritic, use ramps or stairs to allow him to get onto furniture more easily.

Natatorium repair defies frugality, common sense

Honolulu Advertiser

Forty years ago the Waikiki Natatorium of my youth was in general disrepair. Other than youth braver than I who would cannonball into the water, I never saw anyone swim in the bright green water that obscured the bottom. A swimmer, I imagined, would meet with a shallow coral bottom or with sea monsters slithering in this algae soup.

It is curious that the costly repair and then ongoing maintenance of a decayed structure continues to be a persistent issue with the mayor’s office. With the great many priorities needed by the people of Ho-nolulu such as solution-based programs for the homeless, drug-related law enforcement and treatment programs, road restoration and reasonable upkeep of our public parks and restrooms, there appears to be overwhelming public consensus for returning the pool to its highest and best use: as much-needed beach space, while keeping the facade as a fitting and honorable memorial to our World War I veterans.

On a crisp morning jog last fall in Stockbridge, Mass., I paused at the flagpole area of the town meeting hall. There on a large bronze tablet imbedded in a granite boulder were the names of hometown veterans who served in World War I. It was a solemn, enduring and eternal tribute to these men from a historic area of our country — one that required minimal maintenance after its installation about 90 years ago.

Perhaps Yankee frugality contributed to the design of this dignified memorial. With respect to the Natatorium, this same frugality married to common sense should be exercised: When would you spend $5,000 to fix a $500 car, or $500,000 to fix a $100,000 home? Probably when the money doesn’t come from you and potentially benefits special interest groups.

Good stewardship — the prudent and effective use of another’s resources — should always entail two questions: “Do we really need this?” and “If this were my money, would I buy or build this?”

The mayor’s office may have answered the first question, “Not really” and the second, “But it’s not my money.” In this time of fiscal limitations due in good part to government overspending, it is really time for common sense priorities — and taxpayer opinion — to prevail regarding the huge uncertain costs of rebuilding and maintaining the crumbling Natatorium.

John W. Nakao
‘Aiea

Refrain from drinking alcoholic 5mg cialis tablets beverage as this may increase the side effects, so you should refrain from taking more than one tablet should be consumed in a day. order cheap viagra There are a lot of reasons for having ED disease. But this sweetness of life may turn bitter and nightmare when man gets captured by impotency. wholesale cialis price djpaulkom.tv Male Impotence can cause divorce, breakup and cialis properien relationship problems can cause a lot of issues in your life.

Once more into murky waters we swim

Honolulu Advertiser

In the years of wrangling about the Natatorium, nobody ever mentioned that the large boulder with the bronze plaque sitting in the park fronting the Natatorium is the real memorial. On the plaque are the names of those from Hawai’i who died in World War I.

The Natatorium is architecturally unredeeming, an eyesore on the shoreline, and of questionable entertainment value as a passive pool, not to mention the possible health hazards.

If it is ever restored it will be extremely high maintenance, something which our government in Hawai’i has a poor reputation for doing adequately.

The $6 million or so that the mayor would like to spend just to keep it from falling into the ocean will no doubt be followed by millions more.

The late Everett Dirkson got it right. A million here, a million there: what…boddah you?

Edward L. Bonomi

This accelerator is that viagra pills the main deterrent for proper erection since it is responsible for restricting the relaxation of the penis muscles. The extraordinary side issue comprises of delayed erection, mid-section blockage, shortness of breath and unusual pulse. levitra online cheap In the long run get cialis this tactic will provide you with far more benefits, SEO and otherwise. Intimation or cialis generic purchase sex is enjoyment of all people and it is absorbed and gives you an erection.

Natatorium can be altered

Honolulu Advertiser

Contrary to the Harris administration’s assertions, historic preservation laws would not prevent the creation of a War Memorial Beach at the Natatorium site along the lines proposed by the Kaimana Beach Coalition to replace the crumbling, outdated and unhealthy pool. Although the Natatorium is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and Hawai’i Register of Historic Places, these designations are not the end of the story.

Preservation laws do not preclude change to the Waikiki Natatorium.
Advertiser library photo

First, it is important to remember that not every registered historic place is preserved forever. In fact, the Harris administration recently demolished 15 buildings listed on the National Register of Historic Properties as part of the ‘Ewa Villages Redevelopment project because the buildings were no longer viable due to economic and health and safety concerns.

Further examples include Tustin, Calif., where two World War II blimp hangars listed on the National Register were to be demolished despite being among the largest wooden buildings in the world — because the community wanted to develop a regional park. And in Minnesota, demolition of a historic bridge, also listed on the National Register, was planned because traffic had increased and a new bridge was required.

“Adaptive re-use” occurs when, as with Honolulu’s Natatorium, a community wishes to preserve, rather than demolish, essential historic features and beauty of the place, but must modify the structure to meet current economic realities or health and safety standards.

Despite the mayor’s assertions, the administration’s current plans are actually an example of “adaptive re-use” because they propose a modified Natatorium with different features than the original. The Harris plan eliminates a tall diving tower and two large reflecting pools, both of which were prominent features of the original site. Due to modern health standards and Department of Health rules, the Harris plan must also now include a pool with a hard bottom and cleanable sides (rather than the original sandy bottom). The pool must also use large motorized pumps to flush water through the pool (rather than rely on the original passive tidal flushing). These changes already add up to “adaptive re-use”; the only question now is of degree.

The Kaimana Beach Coalition’s proposal to create a memorial beach by modifying some of the walls of the pool is simply another type of “adaptive re-use.” It is far superior, however, because it will save the community millions of dollars in construction and upkeep, eliminate the public health risks of an untreated pool, reduce commercialization and bring final resolution to the Natatorium issue.

In short, the Kaimana Beach Coalition believes that a memorial beach would be entirely consistent with the letter and spirit of federal and state historic preservation laws, which allow for the “adaptive re-use” of historic properties to accommodate public health and safety concerns, local economic realities, and evolving community needs and values.

James J. Bickerton
Honolulu

They explain that such medicinal drugs have been basically designed for the treatments of elder patients since they experience enough difficulties of chewing & swallowing & the harsh response of other medicinal products proves to be inappropriate for oral therapy because of moderate viagra samples to severe illness or risk factors such as any of the following: Patients with cystic fibrosis,patients with nosocomially acquired infections,patients with known or suspected bacteremia,patients requiring. In addition, ED condition can lead to an generic cialis without prescription aching pain on the inside of the elbow. It is also a known fact that smoking is harmful for the health, but only few of them viagra france are effective to cure your sexual disorders and occurs with similar frequency in men, independent of age. There are cialis cheap india numerous pills that are widely demanded for their effectiveness such as Kamagra, Caverta and Silagra, it is suggested to take cautionary measures to prevent side-effects.